Advanced Expression Manipulation¶
In this section, we discuss some ways that we can perform advanced manipulation of expressions.
Understanding Expression Trees¶
Before we can do this, we need to understand how expressions are represented
in SymPy. A mathematical expression is represented as a tree. Let us take
the expression \(x^2 + xy\), i.e., x**2 + x*y
. We can see what this
expression looks like internally by using srepr
>>> from sympy import *
>>> x, y, z = symbols('x y z')
>>> expr = x**2 + x*y
>>> srepr(expr)
"Add(Pow(Symbol('x'), Integer(2)), Mul(Symbol('x'), Symbol('y')))"
The easiest way to tear this apart is to look at a diagram of the expression tree:
First, let’s look at the leaves of this tree. Symbols are instances of the class Symbol. While we have been doing
>>> x = symbols('x')
we could have also done
>>> x = Symbol('x')
Either way, we get a Symbol with the name “x” [1]. For the number in the
expression, 2, we got Integer(2)
. Integer
is the SymPy class for
integers. It is similar to the Python built-in type int
, except that
Integer
plays nicely with other SymPy types.
When we write x**2
, this creates a Pow
object. Pow
is short for
“power”.
>>> srepr(x**2)
"Pow(Symbol('x'), Integer(2))"
We could have created the same object by calling Pow(x, 2)
>>> Pow(x, 2)
x**2
Note that in the srepr
output, we see Integer(2)
, the SymPy version of
integers, even though technically, we input 2
, a Python int. In general,
whenever you combine a SymPy object with a non-SymPy object via some function
or operation, the non-SymPy object will be converted into a SymPy object. The
function that does this is sympify
[2].
>>> type(2)
<... 'int'>
>>> type(sympify(2))
<class 'sympy.core.numbers.Integer'>
We have seen that x**2
is represented as Pow(x, 2)
. What about
x*y
? As we might expect, this is the multiplication of x
and y
.
The SymPy class for multiplication is Mul
.
>>> srepr(x*y)
"Mul(Symbol('x'), Symbol('y'))"
Thus, we could have created the same object by writing Mul(x, y)
.
>>> Mul(x, y)
x*y
Now we get to our final expression, x**2 + x*y
. This is the addition of
our last two objects, Pow(x, 2)
, and Mul(x, y)
. The SymPy class for
addition is Add
, so, as you might expect, to create this object, we use
Add(Pow(x, 2), Mul(x, y))
.
>>> Add(Pow(x, 2), Mul(x, y))
x**2 + x*y
SymPy expression trees can have many branches, and can be quite deep or quite broad. Here is a more complicated example
>>> expr = sin(x*y)/2 - x**2 + 1/y
>>> srepr(expr)
"Add(Mul(Integer(-1), Pow(Symbol('x'), Integer(2))), Mul(Rational(1, 2),
sin(Mul(Symbol('x'), Symbol('y')))), Pow(Symbol('y'), Integer(-1)))"
Here is a diagram
This expression reveals some interesting things about SymPy expression trees. Let’s go through them one by one.
Let’s first look at the term x**2
. As we expected, we see Pow(x, 2)
.
One level up, we see we have Mul(-1, Pow(x, 2))
. There is no subtraction
class in SymPy. x - y
is represented as x + -y
, or, more completely,
x + -1*y
, i.e., Add(x, Mul(-1, y))
.
>>> expr = x - y
>>> srepr(x - y)
"Add(Symbol('x'), Mul(Integer(-1), Symbol('y')))"
Next, look at 1/y
. We might expect to see something like Div(1, y)
,
but similar to subtraction, there is no class in SymPy for division. Rather,
division is represented by a power of -1. Hence, we have Pow(y, -1)
.
What if we had divided something other than 1 by y
, like x/y
? Let’s
see.
>>> expr = x/y
>>> srepr(expr)
"Mul(Symbol('x'), Pow(Symbol('y'), Integer(-1)))"
We see that x/y
is represented as x*y**-1
, i.e., Mul(x, Pow(y,
-1))
.
Finally, let’s look at the sin(x*y)/2
term. Following the pattern of the
previous example, we might expect to see Mul(sin(x*y), Pow(Integer(2),
-1))
. But instead, we have Mul(Rational(1, 2), sin(x*y))
. Rational
numbers are always combined into a single term in a multiplication, so that
when we divide by 2, it is represented as multiplying by 1/2.
Finally, one last note. You may have noticed that the order we entered our
expression and the order that it came out from srepr
or in the graph were
different. You may have also noticed this phenonemon earlier in the
tutorial. For example
>>> 1 + x
x + 1
This because in SymPy, the arguments of the commutative operations Add
and
Mul
are stored in an arbitrary (but consistent!) order, which is
independent of the order inputted (if you’re worried about noncommutative
multiplication, don’t be. In SymPy, you can create noncommutative Symbols
using Symbol('A', commutative=False)
, and the order of multiplication for
noncommutative Symbols is kept the same as the input). Furthermore, as we
shall see in the next section, the printing order and the order in which
things are stored internally need not be the same either.
In general, an important thing to keep in mind when working with SymPy expression trees is this: the internal representation of an expression and the way it is printed need not be the same. The same is true for the input form. If some expression manipulation algorithm is not working in the way you expected it to, chances are, the internal representation of the object is different from what you thought it was.
Recursing through an Expression Tree¶
Now that you know how expression trees work in SymPy, let’s look at how to dig
our way through an expression tree. Every object in SymPy has two very
important attributes, func
, and args
.
func¶
func
is the head of the object. For example, (x*y).func
is Mul
.
Usually it is the same as the class of the object (though there are exceptions
to this rule).
Two notes about func
. First, the class of an object need not be the same
as the one used to create it. For example
>>> expr = Add(x, x)
>>> expr.func
<class 'sympy.core.mul.Mul'>
We created Add(x, x)
, so we might expect expr.func
to be Add
, but
instead we got Mul
. Why is that? Let’s take a closer look at expr
.
>>> expr
2*x
Add(x, x)
, i.e., x + x
, was automatically converted into Mul(2,
x)
, i.e., 2*x
, which is a Mul
. SymPy classes make heavy use of the
__new__
class constructor, which, unlike __init__
, allows a different
class to be returned from the constructor.
Second, some classes are special-cased, usually for efficiency reasons [3].
>>> Integer(2).func
<class 'sympy.core.numbers.Integer'>
>>> Integer(0).func
<class 'sympy.core.numbers.Zero'>
>>> Integer(-1).func
<class 'sympy.core.numbers.NegativeOne'>
For the most part, these issues will not bother us. The special classes
Zero
, One
, NegativeOne
, and so on are subclasses of Integer
,
so as long as you use isinstance
, it will not be an issue.
args¶
args
are the top-level arguments of the object. (x*y).args
would be
(x, y)
. Let’s look at some examples
>>> expr = 3*y**2*x
>>> expr.func
<class 'sympy.core.mul.Mul'>
>>> expr.args
(3, x, y**2)
From this, we can see that expr == Mul(3, y**2, x)
. In fact, we can see
that we can completely reconstruct expr
from its func
and its
args
.
>>> expr.func(*expr.args)
3*x*y**2
>>> expr == expr.func(*expr.args)
True
Note that although we entered 3*y**2*x
, the args
are (3, x, y**2)
.
In a Mul
, the Rational coefficient will come first in the args
, but
other than that, the order of everything else follows no special pattern. To
be sure, though, there is an order.
>>> expr = y**2*3*x
>>> expr.args
(3, x, y**2)
Mul’s args
are sorted, so that the same Mul
will have the same
args
. But the sorting is based on some criteria designed to make the
sorting unique and efficient that has no mathematical significance.
The srepr
form of our expr
is Mul(3, x, Pow(y, 2))
. What if we
want to get at the args
of Pow(y, 2)
. Notice that the y**2
is in
the third slot of expr.args
, i.e., expr.args[2]
.
>>> expr.args[2]
y**2
So to get the args
of this, we call expr.args[2].args
.
>>> expr.args[2].args
(y, 2)
Now what if we try to go deeper. What are the args of y
. Or 2
.
Let’s see.
>>> y.args
()
>>> Integer(2).args
()
They both have empty args
. In SymPy, empty args
signal that we have
hit a leaf of the expression tree.
So there are two possibilities for a SymPy expression. Either it has empty
args
, in which case it is a leaf node in any expression tree, or it has
args
, in which case, it is a branch node of any expression tree. When it
has args
, it can be completely rebuilt from its func
and its args
.
This is expressed in the key invariant.
Key Invariant
Every well-formed SymPy expression must either have empty args
or
satisfy expr == expr.func(*expr.args)
.
(Recall that in Python if a
is a tuple, then f(*a)
means to call f
with arguments from the elements of a
, e.g., f(*(1, 2, 3))
is the same
as f(1, 2, 3)
.)
This key invariant allows us to write simple algorithms that walk expression trees, change them, and rebuild them into new expressions.
Walking the Tree¶
With this knowledge, let’s look at how we can recurse through an expression
tree. The nested nature of args
is a perfect fit for recursive functions.
The base case will be empty args
. Let’s write a simple function that goes
through an expression and prints all the args
at each level.
>>> def pre(expr):
... print(expr)
... for arg in expr.args:
... pre(arg)
See how nice it is that ()
signals leaves in the expression tree. We
don’t even have to write a base case for our recursion; it is handled
automatically by the for loop.
Let’s test our function.
>>> expr = x*y + 1
>>> pre(expr)
x*y + 1
1
x*y
x
y
Can you guess why we called our function pre
? We just wrote a pre-order
traversal function for our expression tree. See if you can write a
post-order traversal function.
Such traversals are so common in SymPy that the generator functions
preorder_traversal
and postorder_traversal
are provided to make such
traversals easy. We could have also written our algorithm as
>>> for arg in preorder_traversal(expr):
... print(arg)
x*y + 1
1
x*y
x
y
Footnotes
[1] | We have been using symbols instead of Symbol because it
automatically splits apart strings into multiple Symbol s.
symbols('x y z') returns a tuple of three Symbol s. Symbol('x y
z') returns a single Symbol called x y z . |
[2] | Technically, it is an internal function called _sympify ,
which differs from sympify in that it does not convert strings. x +
'2' is not allowed. |
[3] | Classes like One and Zero are singletonized, meaning
that only one object is ever created, no matter how many times the class is
called. This is done for space efficiency, as these classes are very
common. For example, Zero might occur very often in a sparse matrix
represented densely. As we have seen, NegativeOne occurs any time we
have -x or 1/x . It is also done for speed efficiency because
singletonized objects can be compared by is . The unique objects for
each singletonized class can be accessed from the S object. |