JavaScript/TypeScript unit tests
Our node-based unit tests system is the preferred way to test JavaScript/TypeScript code in Zulip. We prefer it over the Puppeteer black-box whole-app testing, system since it is much (>100x) faster and also easier to do correctly than the Puppeteer system.
You can run this test suite as follows:
tools/test-js-with-node
See test-js-with-node --help
for useful options; even though the
whole suite is quite fast, it still saves time to run a single test by
name when debugging something.
The JS unit tests are written to work with node. You can find them
in web/tests
. Here is an example test from
web/tests/stream_data.test.js
:
(function test_get_by_id() {
stream_data.clear_subscriptions();
var id = 42;
var sub = {
name: 'Denmark',
subscribed: true,
color: 'red',
stream_id: id
};
stream_data.add_sub('Denmark', sub);
sub = stream_data.get_sub('Denmark');
assert.equal(sub.color, 'red');
sub = sub_store.get(id);
assert.equal(sub.color, 'red');
}());
The names of the node tests generally align with the names of the
modules they test. If you modify a JS module in web/src
you should
see if there are corresponding test in web/tests
. If
there are, you should strive to follow the patterns of the existing tests
and add your own tests.
A good first test to read is example1.js. (And then there are several other example files.)
How the node tests work
Unlike the Puppeteer unit tests,
which use a headless Chromium browser connected to a running Zulip
development server, our node unit tests don’t have a browser, don’t
talk to a server, and generally don’t use a complete virtual DOM (a
handful of tests use the jsdom
library for this purpose) because
those slow down the tests a lot, and often don’t add much value.
Instead, the preferred model for our unit tests is to mock DOM
manipulations (which in Zulip are almost exclusively done via
jQuery
) using a custom library
zjquery.
The
unit test file
for zjquery
is designed to be also serve as nice documentation for
how to use zjquery
, and is highly recommended reading for anyone
working on or debugging the Zulip node tests.
Conceptually, the zjquery
library provides minimal versions of most
jQuery
DOM manipulation functions, and has a convenient system for
letting you set up return values for more complex functions. For
example, if the code you’d like to test calls $obj.find()
, you can
use $obj.set_find_results(selector, $value)
to set up zjquery
so
that calls to $obj.find(selector)
will return $value
. See the unit
test file for details.
This process of substituting jQuery
functions with our own code for
testing purposes is known as “stubbing”. zjquery
does not stub all
possible interactions with the dom, as such, you may need to write out
the stub for a function you’re calling in your patch. Typically the stub
is just placed in the test file, to prevent bloating of zjquery
with functions that are only used in a single test.
If you need to stub, you will see an error of this form:
Error: You must create a stub for $("#foo").bar
The zjquery
library itself is only about 500 lines of code, and can
also be a useful resource if you’re having trouble debugging DOM
access in the unit tests.
It is typically a good idea to figure out how to stub a given function based on how other functions have been stubbed in the same file.
Handling dependencies in unit tests
The other big challenge with doing unit tests for a JavaScript project is that often one wants to limit the scope the production code being run, just to avoid doing extra setup work that isn’t relevant to the code you’re trying to test. For that reason, each unit test file explicitly declares all of the modules it depends on, with a few different types of declarations depending on whether we want to:
Exercise the module’s real code for deeper, more realistic testing?
Stub out the module’s interface for more control, speed, and isolation?
Do some combination of the above?
For all the modules where you want to run actual code, add statements like the following toward the top of your test file:
zrequire('util');
zrequire('stream_data');
zrequire('Filter', 'js/filter');
For modules that you want to completely stub out, use a pattern like this:
const reminder = mock_esm("../../web/src/reminder", {
is_deferred_delivery: noop,
});
// then maybe further down
reminder.is_deferred_delivery = () => true;
One can similarly stub out functions in a module’s exported interface
with either noop
functions or actual code.
Finally, there’s the hybrid situation, where you want to borrow some of a module’s real functionality but stub out other pieces. Obviously, this is a pretty strong code smell that the other module might be lacking in cohesion, but sometimes it’s not worth going down the rabbit hole of trying to improve that. The pattern here is this:
// Import real code.
zrequire('narrow_state');
// And later...
narrow_state.stream = function () {
return 'office';
};
Creating new test modules
The test runner (index.js
) automatically runs all .js files in the
web/tests
directory, so you can simply start editing a file
in that directory to create a new test.
Coverage reports
You can automatically generate coverage reports for the JavaScript unit tests like this:
tools/test-js-with-node --coverage
If tests pass, you will get instructions to view coverage reports in your browser.
Note that modules that we don’t test at all aren’t listed in the report, so this tends to overstate how good our overall coverage is, but it’s accurate for individual files. You can also click a filename to see the specific statements and branches not tested. 100% branch coverage isn’t necessarily possible, but getting to at least 80% branch coverage is a good goal.
The overall project goal is to get to 100% node test coverage on all data/logic modules (UI modules are lower priority for unit testing).
Editor debugger integration
Our node test system is pretty simple, and it’s possible to configure the native debugger features of popular editors to allow stepping through the code. Below we document the editors where someone has put together detailed instructions for how to do so. Contributions of notes for other editors are welcome!
Webstorm integration setup
These instructions assume you’re using the Vagrant development environment.
Set up Vagrant in WebStorm.
In WebStorm, navigate to
Preferences -> Tools -> Vagrant
and configure the following:Instance folder
should be the root of thezulip
repository on your host (where the Vagrantfile is located).Provider
should bevirtualbox
on macOS and Docker on LinuxIn
Boxes
, choose the one used for Zulip (unless you use Virtualbox for other things, there should only be one option).
You shouldn’t need to set these additional settings:
Vagrant executable
should already be correctlyvagrant
.Environment Variables
is not needed.
You’ll now need to set up a WebStorm “Debug Configuration”. Open the
Run/Debug Configuration
menu and create a newNode.js
config:Under
Node interpreter:
click the 3 dots to the right side and click on the little plus in the bottom left of theNode.js Interpreters
window.Select
Add Remote...
.In the
Configure Node.js Remote Interpreter
, window selectVagrant
Wait for WebStorm to connect to Vagrant. This will be displayed by the
Vagrant Host URL
section updating to contain the Vagrant SSH URL, e.g.ssh://vagrant@127.0.0.1:2222
.Set the
Node.js interpreter path
to/usr/local/bin/node
Hit
OK
2 times to get back to theRun/Debug Configurations
window.
Under
Working Directory
select the rootzulip
directory.Under
JavaScript file
, enterweb/tests/lib/index.js
– this is the root script for Zulip’s node unit tests.
Congratulations! You’ve now set up the integration.
Running tests with the debugger
To use Webstorm to debug a given node test file, do the following:
Under
Application parameters
choose the node test file that you are trying to test (e.g.web/tests/message_store.test.js
).Under
Path Mappings
, setProject Root
to/srv/zulip
(i.e. where thezulip
Git repository is mounted in the Vagrant guest).Use the WebStorm debugger; see this overview for details on how to use it.