Free Software And GNU

Authors Jason Self

Plaintext

jxself.org

Free Software And GNU Home

You may have heard of "free" software before. One common belief is that it's free of Linux-libre
cost. The majority of free software is available without cost, but "free" really refers to
freedom not price. Specifically, the freedom to run, study, modify and distribute the
GitWeb
software.

If you have all of these freedoms, then the program is free software. If not then the How To
program is proprietary. Proprietary software is a dark alley. Only a select few can
legally know the ins and outs of the program. If you can't run the program for any Articles
purpose that you want, if you can't study and modify the program so that it does (or
doesn't do) whatever you want, then who is your computer really taking orders from? RSS Feed
Certainly not you.

In addition, the license attached to proprietary software often says that you're About Me
forbidden to share copies with anyone else. If you can't legally share copies with your
friends, what what does that say if you're forced to choose between obeying the Contact Me
license of the software or being a good friend and making a copy?
GPL enforced
The developer would have you believe that the restriction to never share with anyone
anywhere ever needs to be in place so that they can get paid, but there are ways for
the developer of a free program to be paid and still give their users freedom. Since If you appreciate any of the things I
free software is about freedom and not price, this means that the developer of the am doing you can make a donation.
program can charge as much as they like for the software as long as the user of the
program receives those four essential freedoms. Anyone that you give a copy of the
program to could also make a donation to the developer if they like the program and
find it useful. The developer can also sell support contracts, and the users of the
program can hire the developer to implement specific features in the program or make
other changes. These are just a few ideas.

Free software does create a different economy. The difference is that the software
remains under control of the users. With proprietary software, the users are
dependent on the developer for bug fixes and other enhancements, who may (or may
not) do what their users ask. The developer may also add anti-features that spy on the
user or report information back to the developer. The developer also has the ability to
change their policies at any time. As a result, the developer has control over the users
and their computers. This is kind of control is unjust. The free software community
believes that everyone needs these freedoms in order to have power and control over
their computing.
The only way out of this is not to use proprietary software, and that's actually pretty
easy. In the 1980's a man named Richard Stallman set out to create a free operating
system for people to use and named it GNU, which is short for "GNU's Not UNIX" and
he started the GNU Project to work on it. With this, Richard launched the free software
movement.

While working on the GNU operating system, there came a time where almost
everything was finished, except for one component: the kernel. A kernel is sort of the
central component of an operating system. The GNU Project began working on their
own kernel, which they named the HURD. While working on it, a man named Linus
Torvalds came along and wrote a kernel of his own. He named that kernel "Linux."
Originally, the kernel that Linus wrote was not free software but he later changed the
license so that it was.

Developing an entire operating system from scratch is a huge task so Richard was
always looking for shortcuts to take, trying to find some existing free software program
that could be used so that they could get to a complete free system sooner. Once the
kernel that Linus wrote was free software, Richard decided to take that kernel and fit it
into that last gap in the GNU system. The resulting combination of GNU and Linux is
the GNU+Linux operating system, although many (incorrectly) simply refer to it as
"Linux."

In that moment it was possible to run a computer in freedom, but that only lasted for a
few years. Linus Torvalds later decided to allow proprietary software into his kernel. In
addition, people would package up GNU and Linux into a "distribution" that people
could easily download and install on their computers. That's good, because it makes
free software more accessible to the world, but the developers of these GNU+Linux
distributions decided that they could become more popular if they also added
proprietary software into the mix. While that may be true, it also meant losing sight of
the original goal. The goal of the GNU operating system was to make something that
people could use in complete freedom, not 95% freedom or even 99.9% freedom. The
world already had proprietary operating systems that people could use if they wanted
to so creating another one wouldn't be improving the situation, and doing so certainly
wouldn't help people escape the control that proprietary software gives the developer.

There were also people that didn't believe in the message about free software and
how proprietary software gives the developer unjust power over their users. They
started an offshoot called "open source" that focuses on the practical benefits of free
software with questions like "What can I do with it?" or "How powerful or reliable is it?"
etc. They don't view proprietary software as something unethical, only less ideal since
they can't study the ins and outs of the software on their own and try to make it
technically better. As a result, the open source movement focuses on something
different than the free software movement.
Fortunately, there are some who still believe in the original message and have
stepped up: There are people working on a project called Linux-libre, to liberate the
Linux kernel. They have a modified version of the kernel with all of that proprietary
software stripped out. In addition, other people decided to create their own
GNU+Linux distributions that don't contain any proprietary software at all. The GNU
Project maintains a list of these completely free GNU+Linux distributions on their
website. This makes it very easy to get started using free software. Today, there are
thousands of free software programs available which let millions of people the world
over have control over their computing.

If you want to learn more about free software, Richard Stallman has an extensive
travel schedule. If you miss him, locals will often record his speeches. You can also
visit your local GNU+Linux User Group. The free software community is very
welcoming to computer users looking to jump ship from proprietary software. You can
also attend a free software conference. Every year, the Free Software Foundation
holds an annual meeting called LibrePlanet in Boston, Massachusetts. There are also
other free software conferences around the world.