Outsourcing Your GPL Obligations

Authors Jason Self

Plaintext

jxself.org

Outsourcing Your GPL Obligations Home

Version 3 of the GNU General Public License updated a free software license that Linux-libre
was, at that point, sixteen years old since version 2 and 18 years since version 1.

There had been numerous legal and technological changes since these older versions GitWeb
were published and it was time for a new version to address these matters.
How To
One improvement clarified the distribution of source code. If you were distributing
software licensed under version 2 of the GPL solely over the internet, version 2 said in Articles
part that

...offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the RSS Feed
same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though
third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the About Me
object code.
Contact Me
I know some that take this to mean they can tell their users to "get the source code
from my upstream provider", in the cases where is one, but that's not really what it
GPL enforced
says. When someone has to go somewhere else to get the source code for the
program then you're not really offering "access to copy the source code from the same
place" which is what the license says. I read this that the source code and object code If you appreciate any of the things I
need to be available from the same place, side by side. am doing you can make a donation.

Version 3 provides additional flexibility for source code fulfillment in section 6 by
saying that the source code can be on a different server and that server can be
operated by a third party (your upstream for example.) This isn't something that
GPLv2 says, so this is yet another an example of how version 3 has improved the
license when compared to version 2.

Although version 3 may permit someone to refer their users to their upstream provider
it's not a requirement. When someone does this I say that they're "outsourcing" their
GPL obligations and it raises certain concerns. For example: Can you guarantee that
your upstream will still be available in the future, at least long enough to satisfy your
obligations under the license? Depending on the specifics your obligation to provide
the complete and corresponding source code for that particular version of the program
could last for many years if you're using #2 from section 6b.

Even if they are still around can you guarantee that they will still have that particular
version of the software available for download later on?
Although version 3 permits you to outsource fulfillment of the source code to someone
else this can't be used as a way to get out of your obligations. You remain responsible
for ensuring that there is source code available but how can you ensure it will be if
you're outsourcing the fulfillment of that critical component to someone else? Yes you
can save some disk space and bandwidth by referring people to somewhere else —
which is worth exactly a penny and a half at the current price of each — but the
potential savings are so small while the potential costs for non-compliance are so high
that outsourcing your GPL obligations really doesn't make sense.