MAC(4) | Device Drivers Manual | MAC(4) |
mac
— Mandatory
Access Control
options MAC
The Mandatory Access Control, or MAC, framework allows administrators to finely control system security by providing for a loadable security policy architecture. It is important to note that due to its nature, MAC security policies may only restrict access relative to one another and the base system policy; they cannot override traditional UNIX security provisions such as file permissions and superuser checks.
Currently, the following MAC policy modules are shipped with FreeBSD:
Name | Description | Labeling | Load time |
mac_biba(4) | Biba integrity policy | yes | boot only |
mac_bsdextended(4) | File system firewall | no | any time |
mac_ifoff(4) | Interface silencing | no | any time |
mac_lomac(4) | Low-Watermark MAC policy | yes | boot only |
mac_mls(4) | Confidentiality policy | yes | boot only |
mac_none(4) | Sample no-op policy | no | any time |
mac_partition(4) | Process partition policy | yes | any time |
mac_portacl(4) | Port bind(2) access control | no | any time |
mac_seeotheruids(4) | See-other-UIDs policy | no | any time |
mac_test(4) | MAC testing policy | no | any time |
Each system subject (processes, sockets, etc.) and each system object (file system objects, sockets, etc.) can carry with it a MAC label. MAC labels contain data in an arbitrary format taken into consideration in making access control decisions for a given operation. Most MAC labels on system subjects and objects can be modified directly or indirectly by the system administrator. The format for a given policy's label may vary depending on the type of object or subject being labeled. More information on the format for MAC labels can be found in the maclabel(7) man page.
By default, file system enforcement of labeled MAC policies relies on a single file system label (see MAC Labels) in order to make access control decisions for all the files in a particular file system. With some policies, this configuration may not allow administrators to take full advantage of features. In order to enable support for labeling files on an individual basis for a particular file system, the “multilabel” flag must be enabled on the file system. To set the “multilabel” flag, drop to single-user mode and unmount the file system, then execute the following command:
tunefs -l enable
filesystem
where filesystem is either the mount point (in fstab(5)) or the special file (in /dev) corresponding to the file system on which to enable multilabel support.
Policy enforcement is divided into the following areas of the system:
From the command line, each type of system object has its own means for setting and modifying its MAC policy label.
Subject/Object | Utility |
File system object | setfmac(8), setfsmac(8) |
Network interface | ifconfig(8) |
TTY (by login class) | login.conf(5) |
User (by login class) | login.conf(5) |
Additionally, the su(1) and setpmac(8) utilities can be used to run a command with a different process label than the shell's current label.
MAC security enforcement itself is transparent to application programs, with the exception that some programs may need to be aware of additional errno(2) returns from various system calls.
The interface for retrieving, handling, and setting policy labels is documented in the mac(3) man page.
mac(3), mac_biba(4), mac_bsdextended(4), mac_ifoff(4), mac_lomac(4), mac_mls(4), mac_none(4), mac_partition(4), mac_portacl(4), mac_seeotheruids(4), mac_test(4), login.conf(5), maclabel(7), getfmac(8), getpmac(8), setfmac(8), setpmac(8), mac(9)
Mandatory Access Control, The FreeBSD Handbook, https://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mac.html.
The mac
implementation first appeared in
FreeBSD 5.0 and was developed by the TrustedBSD
Project.
This software was contributed to the FreeBSD Project by Network Associates Labs, the Security Research Division of Network Associates Inc. under DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035 (“CBOSS”), as part of the DARPA CHATS research program.
While the MAC Framework design is intended to support the containment of the root user, not all attack channels are currently protected by entry point checks. As such, MAC Framework policies should not be relied on, in isolation, to protect against a malicious privileged user.
July 25, 2015 | Debian |