Xnest(1) | General Commands Manual | Xnest(1) |
Xnest - a nested X server
Xnest [ options ]
Xnest is both an X client and an X server. Xnest is a client of the real server which manages windows and graphics requests on its behalf. Xnest is a server to its own clients. Xnest manages windows and graphics requests on their behalf. To these clients, Xnest appears to be a conventional server.
Xnest supports all standard options of the sample server implementation. For more details, please see Xserver(1). The following additional arguments are supported as well.
Starting up Xnest is just as simple as starting up xclock(1) from a terminal emulator. If a user wishes to run Xnest on the same workstation as the real server, it is important that the nested server is given its own listening socket address. Therefore, if there is a server already running on the user's workstation, Xnest will have to be started up with a new display number. Since there is usually no more than one server running on a workstation, specifying ‘Xnest :1’ on the command line will be sufficient for most users. For each server running on the workstation, the display number needs to be incremented by one. Thus, if you wish to start another Xnest, you will need to type ‘Xnest :2’ on the command line.
To run clients in the nested server, each client needs to be given the same display number as the nested server. For example, ‘xterm -display :1’ will start up an xterm process in the first nested server and ‘xterm -display :2’ will start an xterm in the second nested server from the example above. Additional clients can be started from these xterms in each nested server.
Xnest behaves and looks to the real server and other real clients as another real client. It is a rather demanding client, however, since almost any window or graphics request from a nested client will result in a window or graphics request from Xnest to the real server. Therefore, it is desirable that Xnest and the real server are on a local network, or even better, on the same machine. Xnest assumes that the real server supports the SHAPE extension. There is no way to turn off this assumption dynamically. Xnest can be compiled without the SHAPE extension built in, in which case the real server need not support it. Dynamic SHAPE extension selection support may be considered in further development of Xnest.
Since Xnest need not use the same default visual as the the real server, the top-level window of the Xnest client always has its own color map. This implies that other windows' colors will not be displayed properly while the keyboard or pointer focus is in the Xnest window, unless the real server has support for more than one installed color map at any time. The color map associated with the top window of the Xnest client need not be the appropriate color map that the nested server wants installed in the real server. In the case that a nested client attempts to install a color map of a different visual from the default visual of the nested server, Xnest will put the top window of this nested client and all other top windows of the nested clients that use the same color map into the WM_COLORMAP_WINDOWS property of the top-level Xnest window on the real server. Thus, it is important that the real window manager that manages the Xnest top-level window looks at the WM_COLORMAP_WINDOWS property rather than the color map associated with the top-level Xnest window. Since most window managers don't yet appear to implement this convention properly, Xnest can optionally do direct installation of color maps into the real server bypassing the real window manager. If the user chooses this option, it is usually necessary to temporarily disable the real window manager since it will interfere with the Xnest scheme of color map installation.
Keyboard and pointer control procedures of the nested server change the keyboard and pointer control parameters of the real server. Therefore, after Xnest is started up, it will change the keyboard and pointer controls of the real server to its own internal defaults.
Xnest as a server looks exactly like a real server to its own clients. For the clients, there is no way of telling if they are running on a real or a nested server.
As already mentioned, Xnest is a very user-friendly server when it comes to customization. Xnest will pick up a number of command-line arguments that can configure its default visual class and depth, number of screens, etc.
The only apparent intricacy from the users' perspective about using Xnest as a server is the selection of fonts. Xnest manages fonts by loading them locally and then passing the font name to the real server and asking it to load that font remotely. This approach avoids the overload of sending the glyph bits across the network for every text operation, although it is really a bug. The consequence of this approach is that the user will have to worry about two different font paths — a local one for the nested server and a remote one for the real server — since Xnest does not propagate its font path to the real server. The reason for this is because real and nested servers need not run on the same file system which makes the two font paths mutually incompatible. Thus, if there is a font in the local font path of the nested server, there is no guarantee that this font exists in the remote font path of the real server. The xlsfonts(1) client, if run on the nested server, will list fonts in the local font path and, if run on the real server, will list fonts in the remote font path. Before a font can be successfully opened by the nested server, it has to exist in local and remote font paths. It is the users' responsibility to make sure that this is the case.
Make dynamic the requirement for the SHAPE extension in the real server, rather than having to recompile Xnest to turn this requirement on and off.
Perhaps there should be a command-line option to tell Xnest to inherit the keyboard and pointer control parameters from the real server rather than imposing its own.
Xnest should read a customization input file to provide even greater freedom and simplicity in selecting the desired layout.
There is no support for backing store and save unders, but this should also be considered.
The proper implementation of fonts should be moved into the os layer.
Doesn't run well on servers supporting different visual depths.
Still crashes randomly.
Probably has some memory leaks.
Davor Matic, MIT X Consortium
xorg-server 1.20.11 | X Version 11 |