sqlgrey(1) | User Contributed Perl Documentation | sqlgrey(1) |
sqlgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server
sqlgrey [options...]
-h, --help display this help and exit --man display man page --version output version information and exit -d, --daemonize run in the background -p, --pidfile=FILE write process ID to FILE (overrides 'pidfile' in configfile) -k, --kill kill a running sqlgrey (identified by 'pidfile' content) -f, --configfile=FILE read config from FILE (default /etc/sqlgrey/sqlgrey.conf) expecting config_param=value lines, - spaces are ignored, - '#' is used for comments
See the default config file at /etc/sqlgrey/sqlgrey.conf for runtime parameters. If you got sqlgrey from sources, read the HOWTO file in the compressed archive. If it came prepackaged, look into the documentation tree for this file: /usr/share/doc/sqlgrey-<version>/ on most Linux distributions for example.
Sqlgrey is a Postfix policy server implementing greylisting.
When a request for delivery of a mail is received by Postfix via SMTP, the triplet "CLIENT_IP" / "SENDER" / "RECIPIENT" is built. If it is the first time that this triplet is seen, or if the triplet was first seen less than reconnect-delay minutes (1 is the default), then the mail gets rejected with a temporary error. Hopefully spammers or viruses will not try again later, as it is however required per RFC.
In order to alleviate the reconnect delay, sqlgrey uses a 2-level auto-white-list (AWL) system:
It can be disabled by setting group-domain-level to 0.
General idea:
When a SMTP client has been accepted once, if the IP isn't dynamic, greylisting the IP again is only a waste of time when it sends another e-mail. As we already know that this IP runs an RFC-compliant MTA (at least the 4xx error code handling) and will get the new e-mail through anyway.
In the case of mail relays, these AWLs works very well as the same senders and mail domains are constantly coming through the same IP addresses -> the e-mails are quickly accepted on the first try. In the case of individual SMTP servers, this works well if the IP is fixed too. When using a floating IP address, the AWLs are defeated, but it should be the least common case by far.
Why do we put the domain in the AWL and not the IP only ? If we did only store IP addresses, polluting the AWL would be far too easy. It would only take one correctly configured MTA sending one e-mail from one IP one single time to put it in a whitelist used whatever future mails from this IP look like.
With this AWL system, one single mail can only allow whitelisting of mails from a single sender from the same IP...
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... reject_unauth_destination check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:2501
SQLgrey comes with a comprehensive whitelisting system. It can even be configured to fetch up-to-date whitelists from a repository. See the HOWTO for the details.
If you want to disable greylisting for some users you can configure Postfix like this:
/etc/postfix/sqlgrey_recipient_access:
i_like_spam@ee.ethz.ch OK
Then you'll add a check_recipient_access in main.cf before the
check_policy_service :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/sqlgrey_client_access
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/sqlgrey_recipient_access
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023
See <http://www.greylisting.org/> for a description of what greylisting is and <http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html> for a description of how Postfix policy servers work.
Copyright (c) 2004 by Lionel Bouton.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
Lionel Bouton <lionel-dev@bouton.name>
2020-02-16 | perl v5.30.0 |